Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walt Disney Studios Marketing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 22:15, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Walt Disney Studios Marketing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertising article which fails WP:NOTADVERTISING advertising WT's markerting arm. scope_creep (talk) 00:10, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:46, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:46, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:46, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Obvious Disneycruft that isn't needed. Nate • (chatter) 01:15, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not even worth folding into Walt Disney Studios page. No real content to this article. Ceronomus (talk) 04:57, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect to Walt Disney Studios (division), where there are already similar sections on the smaller sub-divisions of the company. Notability almost certainly isn't even remotely a problem, but that still leaves the issue of whether this actually needs a spin off, which at this point it doesn't seem to. TimothyJosephWood 12:40, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Walt Disney Studios (division) without prejudice against recreation of a larger article that establishes notability. James (^talk/_contribs) 14:09, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG -- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Walt Disney Studios (division) definitely doesn't need an article. Elmmapleoakpine (talk) 18:55, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I see no evidence Disney ever has used this term publicly, so I don't support a redirect. The entire article is implied from a person being referred to as "president of marketing at Walt Disney Studios". Power~enwiki (talk) 20:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- nothing is in the article is worth merging. K.e.coffman (talk) 15:11, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.