Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wally Hunter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wally Hunter[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Regardless, WP:TNT. Currently, the only refs are WP:SELFPUB. Online, I can only find profiles, press releases, and mentions in sources. TLA (talk) 02:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Television, Finance, and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the subject from having to pass WP:GNG on his sourceability, but the sourcing present here isn't getting him over GNG at all. I also strongly suspect conflict of interest, as the article has been extensively edited by somebody with the username "Ahunter12388", and even the creator "Mike123321123" has a username that's using similar numbers despite the "Mike" part not being technically connectable to anything. Bearcat (talk) 16:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Trying to figure out whay it has been nominated for deletion? I also got a note form someone asking for $2000 to fix it which appears to be a fraud Huntwall (talk) 04:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This reads like a publicity hand-out, with the lead paragraph a huge glut of a background resume. Tells us what his positions were, what boards he's sat on, but not much on actual achievements. The recent achievements section is more of the same. Education section is just more of his resume. — Maile (talk) 03:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and look through the rest of Mike123321123's extremely sus contribs. jp×g 🗯️ 05:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.