Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wallapop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Deletion rationale is not convincing in light of WP:NTEMP. ST47 (talk) 14:42, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wallapop

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company is no longer significant; seems to have faded away with little relevance once it was acquired. Misterpottery (talk) 12:31, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep perhaps this could use some more sources but if the company still exists and it's relatively well-known I don't particularly see a reason for deletion. Fifthavenuebrands (talk) 12:49, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the article needs some work but it is certainly notable. Barca (talk) 17:14, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.