Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wall Worm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 19:56, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wall Worm

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any reliable sources or establish notability. Article creator and primary (only?) editor is the author of the tools. Sources in use are primary (Shaun Olson) or unreliable. -- ferret (talk) 14:13, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:22, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:22, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd argue that the Polycount news article on Wall Worm by an editor in a 3D industry news site is a reliable source.

Furthermore, there are notable Source Engine experts who are in the process of creating information on using Wall Worm for the Source Engine. When their content is published, it will likely provide the notability requirements as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Please refrain from deletion until that content can be judged. Lightcube (talk) 14:31, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure Polycount is considered a reliable source (It's used as a reference in only three articles, including this one), but besides that, the mention is referencing you directly as a member of Polycount's site. More than a single reference is needed to establish notability. -- ferret (talk) 14:47, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 01:34, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:23, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable, articles may be written, they may not WP:CRYSTALBALL until they are we can't assume they will. Caffeyw (talk) 05:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—Does not meet WP:NSOFT guidelines, particularly "The depth of coverage in the sources should be significant and directly about the software.". Lesser Cartographies (talk) 17:09, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.