Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walkthrough

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Convert to a Disambiguation page. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 04:06, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Walkthrough[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced dicdef, full of OR. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:41, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:24, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:OR, I think. Fails WP:V. Software walkthrough already says what is needed. Game stuff fails Notability, is unsupported. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:16, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If that is the case maybe a redirect to Software walkthrough would be the best idea.--70.24.211.105 (talk) 19:15, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A disambig may be better, as the word "walktrough" can mean a number of things. Being a gamer, I associate it with a Strategy guide, but programmers might associate it with Software walkthrough, and so on. Salvidrim (talk) 19:26, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete & Disambig Most of it is already covered by other articles (Strategy guide, Software walkthrough, Tutoring, Rehearsal, Audit, Virtual tour), ~~plus is seems to currently be vandalised [1].~~ Also wholly unreferenced, very, very likely a lot of OR. Salvidrim (talk) 19:09, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Officially added disambig, as per my comments above. Salvidrim (talk) 02:10, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—There is already a Wiktionary entry for the word. Regards, RJH (talk) 02:09, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - to strategy guide as a plausible search term. They're almost the same thing, anyway. →Σ τ c. 02:20, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Σ. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:29, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to a proper disambig. We should have articles on the clearly notable aspects for games and software development, the others should be preserved where we have a relevant article. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:32, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to disambiguation page. This material is already covered at Strategy guide and Software walkthrough and it's a plausible search term for both. Reach Out to the Truth 01:48, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.