Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walks of Italy (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 16:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Walks of Italy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertisement for a tour company: the sources not in-depth, they're basically advice for travelers, and in one case practically BEGS the reader to view it as reliable ("...whose reputable list of contributions can be found at Danielle's website"), and the prose is pure brochure-speak. How this survived an AFD is beyond me. Calton | Talk 01:18, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 03:08, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 03:08, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 03:08, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:44, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- just an advertisement for an unremarkable tour company. Very close to G11; should have been deleted at the 1st AfD. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 18:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.