Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walker Films - ASL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (A7). kelapstick^(bainuu) 14:38, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Walker Films - ASL[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Admirable project, but I'm not finding the references to establish notability. Article created by owner of the company. --Finngall ^talk 16:19, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:COMPANY due to lack of significant coverage to demonstrate its notability. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 16:42, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 16:44, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. This appears to meet A7. Possibly promotional, so maybe G11. Are deaf film production companies even a notable type of company? Nerd in Texas (talk) 15:47, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete A7. Article does not credibly indicate the significance of the company. Additionally, it doesn't pass the GNG by a search engine test (no reliable, secondary coverage) and was written by a username with an apparent COI. czar ♔ 14:23, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.