Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walk Away (Movie)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete a7, no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki 18:06, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Walk Away (Movie)[edit]

I have been researching this article extensively and I have determined that it is one of two things: either it is a hoax or it is a movie that is being made by the article creator. Internet research shows up no evidence that this movie exists except for the external link cited. The same for Joshua Stallings Film Co. and Jayess Ent. Productions. Neither of the companies the author cited exist. I have backed up this by checking internet sources exhaustively and by calling the state of California to confirm that there is no business registered under either of these names.

The author himself had an article that was CSD'd a few days back for similar reasons and he himself twice attempted to remove delete tags from this article. Note that the author's name is also the same name as the movie's star,director, producer, et al.

Considering the circumstances, I am nominating this article for deletion under WP:NOTFILM, WP:NOR and WP:COI. Trusilver 01:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also... although he is currently blocked, the author would like to express his objection to the deletion of his own page and presumably this one...at least that's the impression I got when he vandalized my user page. Trusilver 01:58, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of sufficient notability to pass WP:NOTFILM. Nice research work by the nom. Kevin 02:59, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hmm, an uncited article for an entirely non-notable flim of which the writer, director and starring actor all happen to have the same name as the user who created the article...this doesn't take a genius. Calgary 03:11, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Or a phone call to the state of California. Good research by the nom, but unnecessary effort for something as obviously non-notable as this. 172.209.244.244 03:32, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was overkill, I know. But I don't like to get caught with my pants down, so to speak. I'd rather do too much research than not enough. I wanted this to be a slam dunk rather than a real debate. Trusilver 03:48, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nn. JJL 03:14, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article is clearly COI, has no notability. It's as if the author is trying to promote this film via Wikipedia. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:17, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete slam dunk it is.DGG 04:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Dennisthe2. --Milton 06:47, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.