Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wale Kwik-Ajet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 20:39, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wale Kwik-Ajet[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about semi-professional footballer that doesn't satisfy WP:GNG or the deprecated WP:NFOOTBALL. PROD was contested on the grounds that it was inappropriate to delete articles that met the former NFOOTBALL standard - however, that isn't the case here. I've searched for online coverage of this footballer (who played during the internet era), and can find nothing but trivial coverage (like the article about his signing by Chester City). Jogurney (talk) 15:13, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Scotland. Shellwood (talk) 16:57, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:12, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as article creator (forgive me, the rules have changed since then!), no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 18:20, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Was unable to find any significant coverage on him when searching on Google, Newspapers.com and Tímarit.is (he played briefly in Iceland). Tried various versions of his name during the search, including Wale Kwick Ajet, but only found trivial mentions. Alvaldi (talk) 18:32, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete - As noted above does not meet notability requirements with no sign of significant coverage. Dunarc (talk) 22:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Coverage is minimal at this moment. desmay (talk) 12:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Fails WP:GNG and WP:Football. Alex-h (talk) 15:12, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Subject appears to lack the WP:SIGCOV required for a standalone article. GauchoDude (talk) 12:22, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.