Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wait But Why

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 02:04, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wait But Why[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no notable blog; almost everything here is from the blog itself DGG ( talk ) 07:58, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:02, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No so, all of the sources are external Deku-shrub (talk) 12:42, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I should have said, the blog itself or other writings by the 2 authors of the blog. ref. 3 is by Urban. Ref 4 is from the blog. Ref 5 is a reprint from Urban. Ref. 6 is to a paragraph that is another reprint from Urban. Ref 7 & 8 are a interview with Musk and Urban. DGG ( talk ) 05:38, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose I'm not so familiar with blog notability guidelines, I had assumed the fact the content was syndicated to wider, more notable sources and that more notable sources had directly cited added to its defacto notability? Deku-shrub (talk) 15:13, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Posts on this website have been widely reprinted or referenced by other notable news media. This make it notable enough. --Neo-Jay (talk) 17:24, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The website has been cited by articles written in the forbes, the atlantic, techninsider etc... Needs expansion on content and references. A m i t 웃 02:40, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly notable enough. --Fixuture (talk) 20:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:00, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.