Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wade Burleson

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 10:41, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wade Burleson

[edit]
Wade Burleson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a single reliable source, let alone the multiple, primary coverage from reliable sources that would be required to have an article. Self-published or minor press books are not notable either. It's basically a resume. Subject is minor Satanism promoter, so would need FRINGE policy coverage as well if article remains. DreamGuy (talk) 15:09, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He promotes it to fight against something that doesn't exist. What would you call it? DreamGuy (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:59, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:10, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Not only is the nominator's commentary completely unnecessary and simply asking for controversy, my searches simply found nothing to suggest better yet aside from some links at News, Books and browser searches. Notifying DGG who lists to be notified of Christianity subjects. SwisterTwister talk 06:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello? Just stating the facts. Your added commentary is unnecessary. DreamGuy (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again Dave for commenting, I actually pinged a while ago for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayanth Munigala and it's gotten consensus if you wish to close it as such or comment either way. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 07:48, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:37, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 01:06, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment -- We normally keep articles on bishops of major denominations. Should that be extended to the senior state officers of other denominations? If so, we should keep him. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:54, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sources Here [3] the Washington Post describes a blog post of his in some detail; here: [4] The Christian Century discusses a position he took; here: [] thttp://www.christianpost.com/news/backlash-over-muslim-seminary-student-sparks-emotional-apology-from-paige-patterson-at-sbc-121446/he Christian Post does; and again: [5] - all of these articles do more than quote and describe him, they discuss his position on political or theological issues at some length. And there are more. All it takes is to actually do a search and actually look at the articles that come up. People unwilling to do that should not bring articles to AFD, and should not iVote. Clearly, the page needs improvement. But equally clear is the fact that the Nom did not read the news stories cited in the article before bringing this to AFD (if he had, he could not have characterized Burleson as a "Satanism promoter" or as "fringe"). WP:TROUT to Nom. There ought, in fact, to be some stronger reprimand to Nom for bringing this article to AFD with that degree of inaccurate characterization. TROUT also to SisterTwister for her assertion that she ran searches and "found nothing". It is time to close this AFD that NEVER SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED with a KEEP.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Southern Baptists press for uniformity". Reading Eagle. January 21, 2006.
  2. ^ "Southern Baptists fight each other, after defeating liberals". The Tuscaloosa News. January 21, 2006.
  3. ^ "Pastor's blog spurs board's ouster request". NewsOK.com.
  4. ^ "'Man of grace' rises from crowd to head Baptists". NewsOK.com.
  5. ^ "Blogger Burleson resigns from International Mission Board". The Baptist Standard.
  6. ^ "Pastor renews call for database of clergy sex abuse". The Christian Century.
  7. ^ "Censured Southern Baptist Critic Resigns". ChristianityToday.com. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  8. ^ "Denomination's image may become kinder... but no less conservative". Kentucky New Era. June 16, 2006.
  9. ^ "Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary admits its first Muslim student". Washington Post. 19 May 2014.
Hmm, I'm not sure so I'll wait to see what the others say. BTW, somehow (and this has happened with other pings), I never got this one and only noticed it because I watchlisted this AfD. SwisterTwister talk 07:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wade_Burleson&oldid=1086107874"