Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE title history since Draft (2008)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 19:13, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WWE title history since Draft (2008)[edit]

No sources at all. Basic listcruft. It appears to have only one editor. Delete or merge to World Wrestling Entertainment. Simon^KSK 14:55, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The AFD tag is on the article now. - Mgm|^(talk) 17:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I'm missing the point, but lists of title holders in WWE can grow to the point of being unmaintainable because there are so many title fights. Wouldn't it be better to find a source and link it in the main article instead of trying to merge it and bloat the article? (Side note: I don't see why we should use the 2008 draft as an arbitrary cut-off. - Mgm|^(talk) 17:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is nothing special about last years draft (WWE holds one every year) and no particular reason to have the title history since it. All the titles have their own history pages (which include mentions of when they change brands) and the WWE page already has the current champions and who they defeated to win it. TJ Spyke 20:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 20:14, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I say ~~Keep~~ because most championships changed brand with the draft. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RedRooster96 (talk • contribs) 20:20, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article is just redundant. Each title has its own history article, which contains all this information. Nothing was special about this draft, there have been drafts since the brand extension, and this does not warrant its own article. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 20:29, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Nici & TJ. HAZardousMATT^toxic 20:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete So as to not be the odd one out. R R 96 21:38, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Echo remarks by TJ and Nici. KuyaBriBri^Talk 22:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant and because the 2008 draft was nothing special to warrant an article such as this one. Nikki♥311 23:49, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - irrelevant and non-notable history since 2008, notable history is in the WWE main article already.--TRUCO ⁵⁰³ 21:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.