Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WTSD-CA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The nominator fails to advance any argument for deletion or redirection. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 13:40, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WTSD-CA[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cheers! Central Time 301 01:07, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cheers! Central Time 301 01:07, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 01:22, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And your delete rationale is what? (I'm neutral, btw.) Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 02:11, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep per WP:SKCRIT The nominator fails to advance a rationale for deletion. Lightburst (talk) 02:24, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep At this point CentralTime, your nominations are completely disruptive. I must ask for an admin to step in here and restrict the nominator from pushing any more of these nominations which all easily pass WP:BROADCAST and WP:BCASTOUTCOMES and which the nominator refuses to do any WP:BEFORE for. Stop wasting our time and resources! Nate • (chatter) 03:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.