Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WS FTP
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep... Rx StrangeLove 20:07, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Advertising. - Demogorgon's Soup-taster 14:31, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Cleanup/Rewrite. WS_FTP is one of the major FTP clients for Windows, I remember using it in the late '90s. I'd say it's as notable as some of the other software products we've got on WP. It reads as an ad now, but with a rewrite it'd be useful info. — ceejayoz ★ 15:00, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- There, I've gotten rid of the (partially false) marketing speak quoted directly off the website and put in a stub. If we're going to delete this version, most of the apps on the list of FTP clients are going to have to go too. — ceejayoz ★ 15:13, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep following rewrite. I too remember using WS_FTP in the late 90s, and also for a short while about 18 months ago. This is definately notable. Thryduulf 15:29, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I've seen it used in so many places. Pilatus 15:33, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I use it because my alma mater offers it to all students for free, so they can maintain student webpages. -- BD2412 talk 16:46, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, Rewrite and Expand. Andrew pmk | Talk 23:24, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep major software. NSR (talk) 11:34, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Major/notable software in the field of FTP. --Hurricane111 01:26, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable software, at least in the 1990s. —Psychonaut 17:09, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - a significant piece of software which is still used today. Andrew 20:55, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notable SW (I still have it somewhere) Pavel Vozenilek 21:02, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.