Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WS-Policy4MASC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:32, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WS-Policy4MASC[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was an endorsing prod. Original prod was: No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources

That's relevant, as was my comment that an IEEE conference note doesn't indicate sufficient notability to meet the WP:GNG. Deprodded by author. Shadowjams (talk) 05:09, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of notability. Also in its present state it is essentially a list of abstractions not readily comprehensible to the general reader, so if it is kept (which I hope it won't be) then it will need a total rewrite. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:27, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as promotional. Daniel Case (talk) 14:10, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, promotional, and almost completely lacking in context to the point of unintelligibility: WS-Policy4MASC is an XML based language extending WS-Policy with five types of policy assertions: goal policy assertions, action policy assertions, utility policy assertions, probability assertions, and meta-policy assertions. Goal policy assertions specify the desired state. Action policy assertions specify actions taken under certain conditions. Utility policy assertions specify the monetary value of each possible state. Probability policy assertions specify probabilities of each state. Meta-policy assertions specify which action policy assertions are conflicting and which conflict resolution strategy should be used. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - There is no references on the Internet. It's written like a promo or ad. Whenaxis (talk) 11:19, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.