Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WON2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:21, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WON2

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I looked at this article to try to make the references inline, after the creator deleted the 'bitch tag' from the article and put it on the talk page. The sources given in the bottom section are all primary however, and I was unable to find reliable sources for the article. I started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#WON2, where the comments further confirmed my concern about this article's notability. After a couple of hours of searching, I can't find any proof of this meeting WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 16:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article doesn't meet WP:GNG. XboxGamer22408^{talk to me} 17:13, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:32, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. -- ferret (talk) 16:46, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Multiple WP:VG members couldn't find sourcing, nor is it present at the article, so I doubt it meets the WP:GNG. Willing to reconsider if someone finds some reliable sources. Sergecross73 msg me 17:32, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.