Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WISEnut

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WISEnut

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

press release. for non notable company. Every reference seems to be a notice about an individual contract, and not matter how many there are, it isnt significant coverage . Nothing more should really be expected for a firm this size in a very competitive industry. DGG ( talk ) 15:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:06, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:06, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

leaning delete ignoring the blatantly promotional writing style, there's a flurry of mentions in RSes, but looking at them I'm not convinced either. If kept, this will be considerably shorter - David Gerard (talk) 07:41, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:PROMO with a touch of WP:TNT. No prejudice if anyone wants to recreated based on RS. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:49, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.