Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WCO Columbus Programme

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to World Customs Organization. Courcelles (talk) 01:48, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WCO Columbus Programme[edit]

WCO Columbus Programme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not entirely sure if this is notable especially universally rather locally (it seems it may be somewhat known locally in Columbus, Ohio) and the best results my searches found were this, this, this and this. There's no move target and the article has hardly changed since starting in August 2006. Pinging author Rsi73 and I would've also notified Stormbay but it seems they're not active. SwisterTwister talk 21:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Selective merge to World Customs Organization. I certainly can't see enough to justify a standalone article, but there are enough passing mentions (mostly not local to Columbus, Ohio) over the intervening period in both SwisterTwister's searches and the standard ones to make it enough of a search term to justify a mention there. PWilkinson (talk) 09:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 11:31, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.