Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WCC-FM (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete G5 by RoySmith after being moved into draftspace by Discospinster (non-admin closure). Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 16:35, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WCC-FM[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I considered moving this to draft, however, the creator has continually moved the article around all sorts of different Wikipedia spaces already so I have no doubt that it would get moved out of draft. Also, a WP:BEFORE search has yielded zero reliable sources about this radio station so I do not believe that the topic has any potential merit and I believe deletion is preferable to draftification in such instances. No evidence of WP:GNG. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:48, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:48, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:48, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:49, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - related SPI Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/85.5 FOR LA Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:10, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Permanently salt A three-letter call station would not launch with new call letters in 2021, nor would a St. Louis station (which couldn't have a W-prefixed call anyways) somehow serve Los Angeles (though it's been deleted in article space, it's still in the history of the latest sock's sandbox). Enough of this, 85.5 will persist on this article and it needs to be put out of its misery. I'm also loathing the new preference of putting 100% clear hoaxes into draftspace. Nate • (chatter) 22:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this. We should also salt Draft:WCC-FM. Enough is enough. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:45, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.