Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WAAV, Inc. (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:59, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

WAAV, Inc.

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/WAAV, Inc.
• Articles for deletion/WAAV, Inc. (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

WAAV, Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails our notability guidelines for businesses. This passed as keep in 2007, albeit weakly, but all references were removed without explanation in this revision in 2007. I've since restored them, but I don't think that they represent the significant coverage the GNG calls for, as they either mention the company simply in passing or contain routine coverage of a product or a product line launch. schetm (talk) 07:10, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:36, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:36, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 21:50, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dom from Paris (talk) 15:38, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

• Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:14, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
• Delete, I opened the first 4 refs and they didn't return anything remotely close to satisfying ncorp. Szzuk (talk) 08:54, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.