Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W46

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to B46 nuclear bomb. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:19, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

W46

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/W46

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

W46 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article and W41 are unique in that they provide a separate article for the weapon configured as a warhead (i.e. not as a bomb). Many US weapons were used as both bombs and warheads, but in every other case the bomb and warhead variants are consolidated into one page. Some examples include the B28 nuclear bomb, Mark 39 nuclear bomb and B61 nuclear bomb. Further, these two articles are for weapons that never entered production. Kylesenior (talk) 09:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

To be clear, I believe this article should be merged with B46 nuclear bomb.Kylesenior (talk) 01:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:42, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Merge with W41. Rlink2 (talk) 00:07, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:16, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:21, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Merge with B46 nuclear bomb. See no reason for a separate article. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.