Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W15CG
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- W15CG (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun (talk) 12:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Mississippi. Let'srun (talk) 12:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: There is unlikely to be any significant coverage for a short-lived LPTV that was only known to carry an apparently-co-owned network… whose article was itself recently deleted for lack of notability. An obvious relic of the looser inclusion standards still in place in 2010. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.