Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W. James Antle III

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As an unsourced BLP, since no sources have been added to the article during the course of this discussion. No prejudice to recreation if reliable sources are in fact found. Shimeru 05:59, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

W. James Antle III[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP. Stonemason89 (talk) 16:50, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lack of sources is grounds for improvement, not deletion. GNews, GBooks, and GScholar have enough hits to provide sourcing. Edward321 (talk) 14:01, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not sure why this is at AFD - subject seems notable both as a journalist and as an editor. Ϣere SpielChequers 17:01, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Notable as an editor, I guess. As an author, I find lots of stuff written BY him, at notable publications ranging from The Guardian to Politico to American Spectator to Reason. But where is the independent sourcing ABOUT him, that we are supposed to demand as a condition of notability? I couldn't find any. Edward, if you found independent reliable sources ABOUT him (rather than BY him), please cite a few. --MelanieN (talk) 01:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:16, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.