Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W/O V.Varaprasad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy redirect to Ram Gopal Varma#As producer. Strong consensus and the author has been blocked as a sockpuppet. Favonian (talk) 18:55, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

W/O V.Varaprasad[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:MOVIE criteria: except the information about director and producer, there is no relevant information, such as full length reviews (by two or more nationally known critics)/deemed notability by a broad survey of film critics, academics.../commercial re-release, screened at notable film festival etc., that would show article's notability. Alex^{discussion ★} 11:28, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please go through the discussion below : the template of deletion was posted by user and not by admind — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vensatry234 (talk • contribs)

is a film produced by Ram Gopal Varma and directed by Vamsy. the article is notable enough, not every Indian film would be reviewed by critics. Thanx (Vensatry234 (talk) 11:41, 15 October 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

OK, I don't feel doubt about it, but you need to add information that will more likely explain why the article is notable, unless you do that, I afraid the article will be deleted. Tip: if the film gained any awards, was screened at glorious festivals, then insert that information! Alex^{discussion ★} 11:44, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is already established. (In that It is the list if filmography in Ram Gopal Varma Template. This article needs additional citations for verification. Notability is different from Sources. Please check this with experiences users, if ur an amateur. I am in the process of citing published sources (Vensatry234 (talk) 11:48, 15 October 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

Please come down. As you are the one who is relatively new on the Wikipedia, you need to be patient. First, you cannot remove AfD tags from pages proposed for deletion, until article's discussion is closed. If you believe the article should not be deleted, you can write on article's deletion discussion, listed on the tag. Regards, Alex^{discussion ★} 11:53, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I read a book written by a police officer saying that is the worst thing to say to try calm someone down ;-) Matthew Thompson ^{talk to me bro!} 15:56, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please check ur talk page, I am done with this, dont waste my time, see below: (Vensatry234 (talk) 11:57, 15 October 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

I am experienced user than u, u will be blocked for edit warring, if u vandalise the article. The articles's notability is established. Thank you (Vensatry234 (talk) 11:54, 15 October 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

I have discussed the issue with u, so u close discussion, it is ur job to close, as u posted the amateurish notability template (Vensatry234 (talk) 12:03, 15 October 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

An admin did not propose deletions, User:Aleksa Lukic just posted the template to vandalise it. admin did not post it as it is obvious the notability is establsihed. Ur amateurish behavior is like removing filmography of a director (Vensatry234 (talk) 12:11, 15 October 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

Any editor may nominate an article for deletion. Favonian (talk) 12:12, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Any editor can also denominate vandalism. (Vensatry234 (talk) 12:15, 15 October 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

This article is a part of films produced by Ram Gopal Varma - The discussion ends here. so if any body who have the rights to close the discussion and remove the deletion template on this article. please go ahead and make sure other editors do not vandalise it. (Vensatry234 (talk) 12:40, 15 October 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 13:36, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, IMDb is not an acceptable source, I can't find anything elsewhere. Matthew Thompson ^{talk to me bro!} 15:56, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Can't find any evidence that it is notable. Lugnuts (talk) 16:10, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ per nom --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Repel All Borders ‖ 18:52, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ - non-notable film. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:54, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Ram Gopal Varma#As producer. While the film does not seem to merit its own seperate stub article, it IS verifiable as one of many from that notable Indian filmmaker,[1] so let's redirect to the one spot where, as a work of the filmmaker, it makes sense to have it mentioned. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:08, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - Not averse to that. If done, though, the same should be considered for Mrugam and Deyyam. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 23:19, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - per the excellent reasoning of MichaelQSchmidt →Σ τ c. 02:07, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Redirect is fine with me. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:53, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Change to redirect Yes, that's a better solution. Nice work MQS! Lugnuts (talk) 07:58, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.