Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vulnerability and care theory of love
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to James Giles (philosopher). LFaraone 01:26, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Vulnerability and care theory of love[edit]
- Vulnerability and care theory of love (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable theory of a not particularly notable philosopher; see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giles' theory of sexual desire. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:57, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- Merge to James Giles. As with the article on his theory of sexual desire, this theory is closely linked with Giles (to say the least), and it would make sense to discuss both this and his theory of sexual desire together, in the context of his wider philosophy. There are some external references even if the article currently lacks any inline citations. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:27, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- Merge with James Giles (philosopher), agree with rationale by nominator and Colapeninsula, above. — Cirt (talk) 20:52, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.