Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vr-zone (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 02:17, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Vr-zone

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Vr-zone
• Articles for deletion/Vr-zone (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Vr-zone (3rd nomination)

Vr-zone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website. A single source that makes a single mention of the site's forums doesn't convey the notability required for WP:WEB or WP:GNG, and I was unable to find anything else that would establish any sort of notability for the article's subject. SudoGhost 00:58, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

• Weak delete Alexa rank in Singapore is 153, so the basic fact that it is at least somewhat popular locally seems to be accurate. That's the end of the good news though. Pathetic sourcing and the article is mostly just a random list of events. I don't think cleanup is possible, and Wikipedia is, afterall, not a web directory. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:31, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Delete. Only once source that was about a scam, not the site itself. Struggling to find enough in the way of reliable sources to support the article. The many grand unsourced claims and external links in the body suggest to me it was written to promote the site rather than inform about it. Would need to be stubified and written from scratch if kept at all. Яehevkor ✉ 12:25, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.