Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vonnegut Hardware Company
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. –MuZemike 18:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Vonnegut Hardware Company[edit]
- Vonnegut Hardware Company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I could not find significant coverage for this business; gBooks shows many hits but most seem to be mere mentions, not in-depth discussion of the subject. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:41, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep the connections to the Vonnegut family make this somewhat compelling for me. I know that notability is not inherited, which is why I am only weakly behind this, still I don't find that this article quite merits deletion. --Jayron32 02:45, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. I'm also weak on this, but I do see some historical worth. I'd be happier if this at least could be merged somewhere. Has the primary author been notified? Maybe he can expand it a little. -- Ϫ 18:43, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Another weak keep. I think notability is rather borderline. Jayron makes the point more eloquently than I would. bobrayner (talk) 18:33, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.