Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volt Technical Resources
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) asilvering (talk) 04:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Volt Technical Resources (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP,WP:SIRS. Refs are business news, 404's, press-release. scope_creepTalk 15:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the $5÷1deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, and New York. Skynxnex (talk) 15:39, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - Keep this close to $1 billion Corporation with tens of thousands of employees. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jax 0677: Can you point me to the place in the Wikipedia notability polcies where it says that the size or value of a company makes them notable, please. scope_creepTalk 15:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Reply - I would be surprised if a company that size has never had any controversy. I googled "Volt Information Sciences controversy" and got many results. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- So you don't have anything, actually. What you did is based on a raw search url which is never a good way of doing it and is illegal as a reference. Controversies don't make for notabilty either. If you WP:THREE references, post them up so we can have a look at them. scope_creepTalk 15:59, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Reply - I have just added History and Controversies to the article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 05:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- So you don't have anything, actually. What you did is based on a raw search url which is never a good way of doing it and is illegal as a reference. Controversies don't make for notabilty either. If you WP:THREE references, post them up so we can have a look at them. scope_creepTalk 15:59, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jax 0677: Can you point me to the place in the Wikipedia notability polcies where it says that the size or value of a company makes them notable, please. scope_creepTalk 15:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. Its listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Nomination Withdrawn scope_creepTalk 16:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.