Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voices of Men

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 06:33, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voices of Men[edit]

Voices of Men (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization, entirely self-referenced. Orphaned for over five years. Minimal edit history, recent COI. HalJor (talk) 23:18, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:21, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:22, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:22, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. MBlaze Lightning talk 06:20, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that this is not Voice of Men (a singing group.) Also, there other activist groups with the very similar names, such as "The Voice of Men," (ideologically similar to National Organization for Men Against Sexism,) "The Voice of Men," got enough WP:SIGCOV nationwide back in the 90s that it could support an article. This "Voices of Men," however, seems to be covered only locally, and local coverage in the Appleton, Wisconsin Post-Crescent, is not enough to make a local activist organization notable.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:06, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Stub, not properly sourced (or rather sourced to the organization itself, with 2/3 links broken). BEFORE shows mainly local coverage in the Appleton Post Crescent - and not much of that. Does not meet GNG/WP:ORG.Icewhiz (talk) 12:27, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. fails WP:NORG--DBigXray 12:17, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Despite a modest amount of local coverage over the years, fails WP:NORG.E.M.Gregory (talk) 06:02, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.