Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vogue towers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 13:21, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vogue towers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable building. No sources provided. Man way 19:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Though far from perfect, Google Search sources suggest some degree of notability. dci | TALK 23:16, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Having done a search myself, I would concur with dci. This appears to be a recently built shopping mall. These newspaper clippings may help add credibility Lahore: Launch of Little London Company in Vogue Towers (The Saturday Post); Object’s flagship store opens in Lahore (Express Tribune) (quote: I am delighted to finally be opening doors at Lahore’s most prestigious shopping destination Vogue Towers; Waseem Noor at Vogue Towers, Lahore (Express Tribune) plus the many general non-news links on web. I would be willing to improve this article when I have some free time with more references. Mar4d (talk) 14:21, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.