Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladan Kuzmanović

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 10:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vladan Kuzmanović[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

GNG fail. Article was deleted by PROD in August 2019 with reasoning I agree with: "not notable. seems to be a self-publisher of written work. no refs, no useful ghits I've found." See also this AfD, which seems related. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2020 (UTC) ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:37, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:37, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:37, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The sources are unreliable. Also the article appears to indicate that the subject is notable for generating nonsense text, which is more likely to be a claim than a real achievement. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Don't delete - The sources are as for any other Serbian musician RELIABLE: Discogs with albums, MusicBrainz. PAGE HAVE AUTHORITY CONTROL, Orcid, and great wikicommons archive with ogg files, valid .jpg files, the author is going to be in Library of Congress next year (two more books)! Why should delete page with valuable .jpg and DISCOGS notion. --Lepota (talk) 06:36, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The subject of this article does not meet Wikipedia criteria to pass GNG, NARTIST, nor BIO guidelines. Wikipedia is not for promoting every artist or musician in the world. Netherzone (talk) 13:27, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG; I can't see or find even one decent reliable source Spiderone 23:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources seems unauthentic hence fails WP:GNG. Woinfosd (talk) 13:18, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 18:47, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.