Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viviane Senna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Instituto Ayrton Senna. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Viviane Senna[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet GNG. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Nswix (talk) 20:45, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Brazil. Nswix (talk) 20:45, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Everything mentioned about her is in relation to her brother, all Gnews and Gsearch points to him. She could perhaps be a brief section in his article. Oaktree b (talk) 23:06, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Viviane Senna founded a non-governmental organization focused on education with prominence in the media.[1][2] She is often interviewed about educational themes, not only about her brother's legacy.[3][4] In any case, if it is not possible to keep it, I suggest to merge the article with that of the Ayrton Senna Institute. DanGFSouza (talk) 21:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm ok with the merge. Oaktree b (talk) 14:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. DId you mean Merging with Instituto Ayrton Senna because the page you link to is a Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:10, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that was what I meant. I've added some sourced statements since the AfD nomination I think they can support the subject's notability; I leave the decision to the consensus. DanGFSouza (talk) 23:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:39, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.