Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vitamin S (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:59, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vitamin S (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Insufficient notability. Poorly referenced (and many of the existing references are dead links) Rangatira80 (talk) 07:41, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:39, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:39, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:39, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 22:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 22:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Sounds like a fun thing to be a part of, but not a notable entity. BD2412 T 18:36, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.