Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vita (rapper)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 03:53, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vita (rapper)[edit]

Non-notable per WP:MUSIC. Just a few featured vocals on other artists albums and a couple of minor movie roles in two independent features, one that looks like it never got released. -Nv8200p talk 03:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If this one gets deleted, many other obscure records would have to go instantly. Lots of new articles are indeed about untraded records (and musicians), means they are not the usual sortiment of media markets. Guess this one is noteable enough. Anyway, i have in mind to discuss the issue (in general) on the village pump. Wikipedia needs more exact policies on what is noteable in terms of music records, musicians.User:Yy-bo 14:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and WP:MUSIC. Marcus22 15:39, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She receives label credit on "Down 4 U" and "Put It On Me," both of which were top ten hits in the United States. Does it matter if she wasn't the primary artist if she is still credited with two big hits? It doesn't appear to by WP:MUSIC. Her releases were on a major label. The work she did was with major artists. GassyGuy 04:00, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

keep please she is credited on hit songs with major labels and major artists Yuckfoo 17:39, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.