Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishwas Gowda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:21, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vishwas Gowda[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources found except database entries and passing mentions. Broc (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and India. Broc (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have mentioned all the refernces which are i got about Vishwas Gowda, I'm not understanding why are you nominated for deletion my page. please explain me corrrectly. 2409:40F2:29:33B4:E544:9C24:D680:FFD (talk) 14:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are there reliable sources that you can come up with that has significant coverage or even somewhat reasonable coverage to keep this page? Page needs more than just sources on stats. RangersRus (talk) 15:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:19, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The sources are statistics and do not have any coverage on the career, background or even early life of this kabaddi player. I do not see any coverage in reliable media publications or else would have voted to Draftify. Fails WP:N. RangersRus (talk) 15:36, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Faols notability guidelines; no SIGCOV, no RS GNG sources. Some irrelevant content on google shows a different person instead. Toadette ^{(Let's discuss together!)} 08:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.