Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishveshwarya Group of Institutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:49, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vishveshwarya Group of Institutions

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies on primary sources. A few paid link websites with a BEFORE. Does not satisfy NSCHOOLS. Creator is an SPA. Vikram Vincent 06:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 06:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 06:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 06:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails NSCHOOLS imo. Kolma8 (talk) 20:48, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Educational colleges must take softly as per Wikipedia. Affiliated with a reputed University.Tictictoc (talk) 06:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- On the basis of what policy? Vikram Vincent 07:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources to establish notabililty; private technical colleges are not inherently notable. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:28, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Accredited, degree-awarding tertiary institution. We have always kept these by consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:53, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- This editor is talking about some nonexistent consensus. Several AFDs where they have !voted keep have been deleted. Unless they come up with proof to support their "consensus" their vote needs to be ignored. Vikram Vincent 10:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.