Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishalgoswami

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:16, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vishalgoswami[edit]

Vishalgoswami (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neither Vishalgoswami or Vishal Goswami appear to be notable. Also worth noting this has been created under other titles such as Vishal Goswami (VG) Praxidicae (talk) 18:34, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:42, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:42, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete CSD#A7 (person). No relevant hits anywhere, only mentions are of different Vishal Goswamis across India. --qedk (t c) 20:13, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete. No assertion of notability and the article is borderline nonsense.Citing (talk) 18:16, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:SNOW, WP:TNT, and WP:MILL; and possibly salt them all, as a re-created non-notable BLP. Bearian (talk) 18:43, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.