Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vish Narain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:32, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vish Narain[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find sources to show that he meets WP:GNG / WP:BASIC. Having worked with notable firms doesn't make a person notable, and the listed awards don't automatically confer notability, either – especially as there are no independent, secondary sources that discuss his receiving them. bonadea contributions talk 13:41, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India. bonadea contributions talk 13:41, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment We can trust any secondary sources found on this page WP:RSP and WP:FORBESCON. D 🐕 B 🦇K🐞 (talk) 16:05, 5 November 2022 (UTC)-strike sock Star Mississippi 01:25, 7 November 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:36, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. Mccapra (talk) 10:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I don't see any significance of the article, and most sources are unreliable. Timothytyy (talk) 12:31, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.