Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual plague
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Corrupted Blood incident. Jujutacular talk 00:52, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Virtual plague (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Two disparate events. There isn't a unifying subject here worthy of note. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 22:54, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Corrupted Blood incident. Rationale for keeping the redirect is that the term leaked into mainstream media like [1] (which cites authors of [2] in Lancet), the refs used in Corrupted Blood incident etc. East of Borschov 01:17, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Since the Corrupted Blood incident is of considerable interest, surely we should make some mention of the lethal guinea pig, which has several similarities and several interesting differences. Maybe a "similar incidents" section on Corrupted Blood's article? --Kizor
- Redirect per East of Borschov and suggest expanding Corrupted Blood incident to note other similar instances, per Kizor Torinir ( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options ) 08:02, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.