Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual Wallet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to PNC Bank. Davewild (talk) 18:36, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual Wallet[edit]

Virtual Wallet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The entire article only consists of a few sentences, and largely hasn't been updated in years. The topic isn't notable enough to warrant its own article. Dnywlsh (talk) 16:21, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment not, as I expected, the general concept, but a specific app. Probably if we have a more general article somewhere we should redirect to it, especially given that between phone transactions and bitcoin it's an area that is hotting up, while the current subject of this article seems to have been left behind. Artw (talk) 23:06, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Artw: - Maybe a blurb could be added to the main PNC article. Even so, Virtual Wallet is more than just an app, it's a combination checking/savings account that PNC offers. I don't think it needs its own article, though, since it's just one of many accounts that the bank offers. Dnywlsh (talk) 12:48, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@SwisterTwister: - I just don't believe that it's notable enough to warrant it's own page. Maybe a sentence or two in the PNC article, if that, since it's really just one of the many accounts that they offer. Dnywlsh (talk) 13:20, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 14:23, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.