Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual Skies Network

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 19:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual Skies Network[edit]

Virtual Skies Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable video game players group Deunanknute (talk) 13:20, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Not seeing any good references. NickCT (talk) 16:50, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 02:02, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 02:02, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 02:03, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) NORTH AMERICA1000 02:04, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 10:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no evidence of notability just appears to be a self-referenced gamer network. MilborneOne (talk) 17:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.