Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virginia State Route 600 (Lee and Scott Counties)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Virginia State Route 600. czar 19:36, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Virginia State Route 600 (Lee and Scott Counties)[edit]

Virginia State Route 600 (Lee and Scott Counties) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May be a non-notable secondary road. Philroc (c) 13:23, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:18, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:18, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Virginia State Route 600. From State highways in Virginia: Virginia has 48,305 miles (77,739 km) of secondary routes. These roads, numbered 600 and up, receive less funding than primary routes. Numbers are only unique within each county, and routes that cross county lines generally, but not always, keep their numbers. The non-policy WP:HIGHWAYS suggests that for the most part, county highways should be in a list article and the sourcing (entirely to Virginia government sources) suggests that should be done here. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:29, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support, with the stipulation that the article content be included in the Virginia State Route 600 article, most importantly that the Lee and Scott SR 600s connect at the county line.  V 02:23, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:16, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:33, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.