Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virality
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep and revert. Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:10, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Virality[edit]
- Virality (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Seems to be someone's personal invention. A search yields no results [1]. meshach (talk) 21:57, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- please revert back to the original text (simple dab page without all the crap). "Virality" is a commonly used term. — Pengo 22:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neologism. Virality is not an actual word see http://dictionary.cambridge.org/results.asp?searchword=Virality&x=0&y=0 as an example. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 00:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Revert to the disambiguation page. Were it possible to expel neologisms by fiat from the English language, I would have sanitized this one with bleach a long time ago, along with viral phenomenon itself. Phrases like viral phenomenon are fungal phenomena in any case. But virality is a regular formation, people are going to use it, and as such the disambiguation page is likely useful. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:30, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Revert to DAB - Whpq (talk) 16:22, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- keep and expand. We do not limit ourselves to what less comprehensive information sources include--certainly not to a school dictionary for second language learners like the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary. DGG (talk) 20:14, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Its not in the Oxford English Dictionary either; is that more to your liking? If you'd bothered to read the words "as an example" you might've saved the sneering. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 00:33, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.