Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vipin Das (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vipin Das[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vipin Das

Film director who does not satisfy creative notability or general notability. There already was an AFD in March 2022. I have not seen the deleted article, so am not tagging this article for G4, but am noting that there does not appear to have been any substantial change. The authors attempted to game the title with an unnecessary disambiguation, which has been removed. The references are interviews, press releases, and a review of a movie (which is about the movie).

Number	Reference	Remarks	Independent	Significant	Reliable	Secondary
1	thenewsminute.com	An interview	No	Yes		No
2	cinemaexpress.com	Another interview	No	Yes		No
3	timesofindia.com	A review of a movie	Yes	Not about the subject	No	Yes
4	thehindu.com	An interview with the subject	No	Yes	Yes	No
5	thenewsminute.com	A press release about a movie	No	Yes		No
6	timesofindia.com	Advertisement for a movie	No	No	No	No
7	indianexpress.com	An article about a movie	Yes	Not about the subject		Yes

The subject wasn’t notable two months ago, and not much has changed. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:56, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Entertainment, and Kerala. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:56, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ per nom as clearly non-notable (quite apart from other issues). And thank-you to the nommer for providing such a useful source analysis. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:33, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Changing my !vote to speedy delete, now that some of the other issues are out in the open. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:13, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Fails WP:NCREATIVE/WP:NFILMMAKER just like Das failed last time. Obvious sockery. Strongly suggest salting to seek to prevent pointless re-creation. Agree with nom on reference analysis. Suggest Speedy because this is, surely, the re-creation of an article deleted at a prior discussion. Pending the outcome of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SuhailShaji786 potentially an article created by a block evading editor, too. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Failed attempt at advertising by what I think is a paid spammer, and indeed nothing has changed in the two months. G5 may also be applicable, per the linked SPI. Java Hurricane 11:29, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.