Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violin Concerto No. 4 (Paganini)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 01:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violin Concerto No. 4 (Paganini)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article about about a somewhat-notable concerto that still reeks of original research after being tagged for 2 months. The tone of the article doesn't feel really encyclopedic either. Command and Conquer Expert! ^{speak to me...}_{review me...} 16:26, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. czar · · 16:37, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. czar · · 16:38, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The issue here is notability rather than whether an article in its current state could be improved by editing. In the case of this piece of music by a notable composer, it is a clearly suitable subject for an encyclopaedia. AllyD (talk) 16:48, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above (and per nom, who himself states that it is somewhat-notable). OR and tone can be changed by editing (WP:ATD). Ansh666 02:57, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Major work by a major composer. Numerous recorded performances by notable musicians. Synopsis of first movement appears to need re-writting, or perhaps trimmend if sources can not be found. Article meets none of the criteria of WP:DEL-REASON. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 17:20, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Notable work by a notable composer, published by major publishers, performed by notable performers. Article issues are not a reason to delete; trout for the nominator. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.