Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violet Vision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Tone 14:24, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Violet Vision[edit]

nn, fails WP:BAND, appears to be a vanity page - sourced to the band's own website and its myspace page, only released on nn label.

also nominating their albums:

Unfold (Violet Vision album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Heaven Underground (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) <- this was subject of afd before it was released as crystalballism, the notability of the group or album wasn't addressed
First Sign of Communication (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all: They all fail WP:MUSIC. Schuym1 (talk) 19:49, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 04:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-notable artist vanity, fails WP:MUSIC. JamesBurns (talk) 03:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:MUSIC. - SummerPhD (talk) 16:52, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.