Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinod Adani (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Misterrrrr (talk) 09:46, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vinod Adani

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't check the deleted version but the subject is Not Notable. Being a relative of a famous or being from a rich family does not makes anyone Notable. His News are covered with name of his Brother. Misterrrrr (talk) 09:34, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Misterrrrr (talk) 09:44, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Misterrrrr (talk) 09:48, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. He's the ~~third~~sixth richest man in India, and the richest non-resident Indian, and has received coverage from multiple reliable sources reflecting that fact. Regarding his brother: Vinod appears to have his own personal fortune in his own right, separate from his involvement in his brother's businesses. — The Anome (talk) 09:52, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As i can check List of Indians by net worth, i didn't got his name. The first Richest Indian is Vinod Adani's brother Gautam Adani and third Richest Indian is Shiv Nadar. Please provide reliable source about your claim. --- Misterrrrr (talk) 10:01, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Misterrrrr (talk) 09:52, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 January 26. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:54, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, my mistake. He's listed as the sixth richest Indian by multiple sources, eg [1]. I've corrected my comment above. — The Anome (talk) 10:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let it be discussed. --- Misterrrrr (talk) 10:06, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: United Arab Emirates and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: while being the relative of someone notable does not convey notability, being the main subject of multiple news stories in the mainstream media certainly does: please see WP:GNG. — The Anome (talk) 10:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The sources given are good, I also find this write-up in Time [2]. Perhaps not flattering coverage, but we're at GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 15:19, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Oaktree b. I think you should have a second look at the TIME's source you attached. It is regarding Gautam Adani. Not Vinod. Thesixserra (talk) 17:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He's mentioned in passing, yes. I still think we have enough for a keep, maybe not a strong case though. Oaktree b (talk) 17:56, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per Oaktree b's arguments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by QRep2020 (talk • contribs)
keep there is no media frenzy, but the subject has received enough WP:SUSTAINED coverage over the years to establish notability. —usernamekiran (talk) 18:57, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.