Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinesh Sinha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vinesh Sinha[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable businessperson with unreliable sources. The prev. version was deleted speedy as advertising, and this is not much better. It was able to evade AfC because the contibutor had accumulate the necessary number of edits by creating the now -deleted article.

The accomplishments are minor: At AfD discussion in the past few years, awards for 30 under 30 and the like have been usually taken to indicate "Not Yet Notable". They're purely PR awards, they are organized so a great many people get the awards in mone or another of the very many categories, and have no other significance. Similarly the top 100 listing designed for promotion, with multiple categories. And the one possibly significant award listed he didn;t win, it's just a nomination.

He founded two non-notable companies. he invested in another. The promotional nature is even more clearly seen in the infobox's education section: "London School of Commerce (Dropped out)" which reminds me of the legendary CV that included "BA (failed)" 00 Tho it's fair to say we have thousand of bios which list "attended" not "graduated" -- some of these are typically non-degree programs, but others, we should re-examine.

The photo is an obviously profesionala portrait, licensedd here as "own work"

I assume an undeclared coi editor, for they've worked on nothing else

the references are what we'd expect: mere notices abut either him or his companies, or promotional write-ups about the minor awards, and promotional interviews where the subject (or their PR representative) is allowed to say whatever they care to. Consensus now is these are not independent. DGG ( talk ) 10:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable, looks like created by WP:UPE for WP:PROMOTION only. — Amkgp 💬 13:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete spammy article. Merely establishing businesses and/representing it doesn't make anyone notable. RationalPuff (talk) 08:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the nominator has summed the situation up perfectly. Purely promotional, not notable and inappropriate for an encyclopaedia. Take this to Linkedin or some other place Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.