Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinculum Group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:32, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vinculum Group[edit]

Vinculum Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable organization that fails to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH & invariably fails WP:NCORP as well. A before only shows primary sources discussing them. Celestina007 (talk) 16:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:TNT and WP:GNG. It's some sort of software company, but the page is so badly written that I can't tell what it does that would make it notable. Ping me if you can fix this mess. Bearian (talk) 17:16, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The sources are all routine business announcements or hastily rewritten press releases. There doesn't appear to be any original reporting on the company. I don't think the SBR Business Case Studies Awards are a notable award, and the article that mentions them is the Singapore Business Review (SBR) who is writing about their own event, hosted by the Charlton Media Group, the owner of the Singapore Business Review. Vexations (talk) 16:54, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Per nom - per WP:TNT and WP:GNG. - MA Javadi (talk) 21:27, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.