Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincentius Escarcha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No arguments establishing notability have been made during the course of this discussion, therefore the article's subject is found to lack notability. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:57, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vincentius Escarcha[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable religious figure/cleric. Quis separabit? 19:20, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete without prejudice against recreation if reliable sources are found. I was unable to find significant coverage about the subject. Most of the sources I found through searches were Wikipedia mirrors.
There is insufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Vincentius Escarcha to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 05:10, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.